| 
       I
      recently had the chance to convince a long-time friend of mine to send
      over one of his custom AMD upgrade kits. I first met John Moffett while
      working for the All Games Network. Dr. John, (as he is commonly known),
      runs a small web store that supplies custom Intel and AMD upgrade kits for
      avid overclockers called KickAss
      Gear. He was one of the first sponsors AGN ever had, and as such, we
      used to be in frequent contact.
      
       
      Now I had been wanting
      to test out one of AMD’s new 1Ghz systems for quite some time now, but I
      hadn’t been able to get AMD to send over some samples. Dr. John quickly
      came to the rescue, offering one of his custom Thunderbird Athlon upgrade
      kits for a review. The Athlon upgrade kits officially consist of a 900Mhz
      Socket A Athlon processor based on AMD’s new Thunderbird core and an
      ABIT KT7A-RAID jumperless motherboard. My review kit consisted of a
      clock-unlocked 1Ghz Thunderbird processor and an ASUS A7V133 Socket A
      motherboard, based on VIA’s KT133 chipset.
      
       
      At a base price of
      $329, the basic Athlon upgrade kit might seem a bit pricey, but with this
      price you are also guaranteed a processor that will be taken to its
      highest possible speed. Each kit is fully tested at the highest attained
      speed and is also burned in for proper and reliable operation. This
      ensures that you will get a high-performance system as soon as you get it
      installed on your computer case.
      
       
      Installation Process:
      
      
       
      By now, many of you
      must have heard of the installation headaches suffered by many early
      adopters of the Athlon\VIA architecture. I’m happy to report that these
      installation issues have become a thing of the past, (as has been the case
      for quite a long time now). The ASUS motherboard went into my Antec
      mid-tower case without any problems, and it happily accepted my two sticks
      of 128MB Corsair PC-133 SDRAM, my IBM 34GXP 30GB ATA66 hard drive,
      Creative Labs GeForce 2 Ultra video card, and Sound Blaster Live! Platinum
      5.1 PCI sound card.
      
       
      The system booted up
      perfectly and without any fuzz on the first try, a good indication of
      things to come. Like stated before, the ASUS A7V133 is based on VIA’s
      KT133 chipset, which was released to specifically accommodate AMD’s new
      Duron and Thunderbird processor cores. The board itself also features an
      integrated Promise Technologies’ Ultra ATA 100 IDE controller with RAID
      0 support, support for 1Ghz+ Athlon processors, four IDE connectors, three
      DIMM slots, 100 and 133Mhz EV6 bus speed support, and jumperless
      adjustments of bus speeds and clock multipliers. Besides these features,
      the board is fully PC99 compliant, and also features support for
      wake-on-ring, wake-on-LAN, suspend to RAM, etc 
      
       
      It follows a less than
      ideal 1/4/1 expansion slot set up, featuring 1 AGP Pro slot, 4 PCI slots,
      and one shared PCI/AMR slot. Personally, I prefer the six PCI/ISA
      configuration, but then again, the only expansion cards I run are the
      video card and sound card, so it’s not like I’m clamoring for more PCI
      expansion possibilities. One nice touch included on the AGP Pro slot is
      that ASUS has covered the extra portion of the AGP Pro slot for users that
      are installing regular AGP cards. If you were going to install an AGP
      Pro-compliant video card, then you would have to remove the protective
      plastic that covers the extra real estate. This will help to avoid users
      inserting their cards incorrectly.
      
       
      ASUS chose to use the
      popular Award BIOS system, which I personally prefer. I have used BIOS
      systems from Phoenix, and while they feature nice graphical interfaces,
      they don’t quite offer the same amount of information you get from an
      Award BIOS. Being a jumper-less motherboard, (but still including jumper
      blocks for those people that feel inclined to use them), you can adjust
      every single operating parameter from within the Award BIOS shell. This
      means that you will be able to specify custom front side bus speeds,
      custom clock multipliers, (in the case of clock-unlocked processors), set
      the operating speed of your memory independently from the bus speed,
      adjust peripheral parameters, etc. The BIOS correctly detected the 1Ghz
      Athlon processor, and being an unlocked CPU, it harbors some nice
      overclocking potential
      
       
      Barring the incident
      with the ATX power supply connector, (whoops… : ), the only other
      installation problem I encountered was a single IRQ conflict between my
      Sound Blaster Live! Platinum 5.1 and the Promise ATA-100 controller. I
      originally had installed the SB Live! in the second PCI slot, but that
      slot shares an IRQ with the Promise ATA-100 controller. Thankfully, the
      Award BIOS detected the problem and let me know that a conflict could
      occur unless I moved the sound card to another slot. Sure enough, during
      the first WinME boot up, the system locked up. Moving the sound card to
      the third PCI slot solved the problem, and the BIOS warning disappeared
      after making the change. It’s nice to have a BIOS that detects problems
      and warns you of impending trouble.
      
       
      ASUS A7V133 Motherboard
      In Detail:
        
       
        
      
       
      Even though the standard
      KickAss Gear Athlon upgrade kit ships
      with an ABIT KT7A-RAID Socket A motherboard, Dr. John sent me an ASUS A7V133
      Socket A motherboard, based on VIA’s KT133 chipset. As stated above, the
      board comes in a 1\4\1 slot configuration, featuring 1 AGP Pro slot, 4 PCI
      slots, and a shared PCI\AMR slot.
      
       
      As is the case with all
      of ASUS’ motherboards, the included installation and usage manual is one
      of the best in the industry. In some instances too informative, the
      user’s manual should be the first place any user should look for when
      searching for jumper parameters, or for troubleshooting tips. In fact,
      ASUS went as far as building a list of the shared IRQs between the PCI
      slots and the different components on the motherboard. This way, you will
      know instantly where not to install your PCI expansion cards, saving
      people a lot of time in trying to diagnose IRQ conflicts.
      
       
      Like the old 440BX
      motherboards that integrated the then new ATA-66 IDE controllers, the
      A7V133 ships with four IDE connectors. Two of these support the new ATA100
      spec, and are also backwards compatible with the ATA66 and ATA33
      standards. The other two IDE connectors are standard accept ATA66 and
      ATA33 devices. ASUS decided to use the Promise ATA-100 controller for
      ATA100 drive management. As such, you can connect up to eight different
      IDE devices to this motherboard, two per connector in the standard
      master-slave configuration. For this system, I connected an IBM 34GXP 30GB
      ATA66 hard drive as master on the primary IDE connector and an AOpen 1040
      Pro 10X DVD-ROM drive as the master on the secondary channel. The Promise
      ATA-100 controller also allows a user to run a RAID 0 array with similar
      hard drives. Unfortunately, I did not have identical hard drives in order
      to test this feature.
      
       
      Even though the A7V133
      motherboard includes a jumperless design and a compliant BIOS, ASUS
      decided to keep the jumper blocks on the PCB. One of the blocks controls
      the CPU multiplier setting, while the other block controls the front side
      bus speed. Like I said, the motherboard is fully jumperless, but the
      blocks are there for people that prefer to set these options manually. The
      A7V133 also includes support for up to four USB ports, thanks to the VIA
      VT82C686B “Super I\O” southbridge.
      
       
      The upgrade kit has
      already spent two weeks in the lab. Component installation and OS
      installation took me two days. Since that time, the system has been up
      without interruption for a week and a half. In that time, the system has
      only been reset three times. Under this heavy load, the system only
      crashed one time while playing Counter-Strike. At that point, the system
      was severely low in resources, so the crash didn’t really surprise me.
      After that period, the system was shut down for the first time around
      three days ago, when I started my benchmarking runs. But this kind of
      reliability says a lot about ASUS’ manufacturing standards. Personally,
      when I’m building systems for personal use, I always try to build the
      most stable system possible, even if I have to sacrifice a little in the
      performance department. The main reason for this is that I cannot afford
      any kind of downtime due to malfunctions or conflicts. As such, ASUS
      motherboards are hard to beat, as they are some of the most rock-solid
      products users can ever hope to buy.
      
       
      About the only fault I
      could find with the design of the A7V133 is the fact that there is no BIOS
      reset jumper. Well, there is a BIOS reset jumper, but it’s not the kind
      of jumper we have all come to know and love. Instead, ASUS decided to
      include only two small contact points, which can only be shorted out using
      a small metal part to cover both contact points. As if shorting out a
      jumper weren’t tough enough, we know have to use a metal part to short
      out two contact points in the unlikely case a BIOS reset is needed. And as
      it turned out in my case, it was really tough to reset the CMOS… at one
      point during the overclocking tests, I accidentally set the FSB to 133Mhz
      while keeping the clock multiplier at 12, yielding almost 1.6Ghz. As
      expected, the computer would not even post, and as such, the BIOS failsafe
      described in the next paragraph could not engage. Shorting out those
      damned points took me 30 minutes, as I couldn’t get solid contact
      between both points.
      
       
      Of course, that bad
      point is accompanied by a host of good points, the most important of which
      is the fact that the BIOS will go into “safe mode” after an
      overclocking-related lock-up or freeze. In this mode, when the computer is
      restarted, the motherboard enters the BIOS automatically and sets up the
      processor parameters for a safe reboot, with the Front Side Bus set to
      100Mhz and memory also set at 100Mhz. This measure goes a long way towards
      protecting your shinny new processor from damage due to failed
      overclocking attempts.
      
       
      The ASUS A7V133 also
      features a clean and uncluttered design, which is always something users
      should look for when shopping for a new motherboard. The VIA 8363A
      Northbridge also includes it’s own cooling fan and heatsink combo in
      order to keep it’s temperature levels low. The only problem layout-wise
      lies in the fact that the Promise ATA-100 connectors are placed behind the
      AGP Pro slot, which could cause interference between the ribbon cables and
      large AGP video cards. Other than that, the A7V133 design is functional
      and user-friendly. 
      
       
      AMD 1Ghz Thunderbird
      Socket A Processor:
      
       
       
      
      
      
        
                 
      The heart of the upgrade kit is AMD’s Thunderbird 1Ghz Athlon
      processor. One of the biggest improvements over the original Athlon core,
      (besides moving the processors from their original Slot-A package to a
      convenient and more economical Socket package), was the ability of running
      its Level 2 cache at full processor speed.
      
       
      The original Athlon
      processors would operate their Level 2 cache memory at certain fractions
      of the processor’s rated speed, due to the fact that the memory chips
      where not integrated into the processor die, but rather on the card that
      housed the Slot-A processors. With the new Thunderbird core and AMD’s
      successful move to an .18-micron manufacturing process, they were able to
      integrate the Level 2 cache into the processor die, which now allows the
      cache to operate at full processor speed. This means that if you overclock
      your processor, you also gain more performance from the Level 2 cache
      memory. So even though the Thunderbird only includes 256KB of L2 cache,
      (lower than the Athlon’s 512KB of L2 cache), the Thunderbird core will
      outperform the Athlon core because it’s L2 cache is operating much
      faster than the original Athlon’s.
      
       
      Of course, the rest of
      the Athlon features apply to the 1Ghz Thunderbird, including the EV6
      system bus, which is able to operate at 100Mhz or 133Mhz Front Side Bus.
      But, the EV6 bus is able to work both during the rising and falling
      signals, so you are basically getting 200Mhz or 266Mhz Front Side Bus
      speeds, depending on the setting used. Even though all current Socket A
      Thunderbird processors are clock-locked, (meaning you cannot specify a
      custom clock multiplier), Dr. John did provide us with a clock-unlocked 1Ghz
      Thunderbird for testing.
      
       
      Testing Benchmarks And
      Procedures:
      
       
                 
      Here are the components used to build the kit for testing purposes:
      
       
      
        - Motherboard
          – ASUS A7V133 KT133 motherboard using BIOS revision 1004
 
        - Processor
          – AMD 1Ghz Athlon Thunderbird Socket A, clock unlocked
 
        - Hard
          Drive – IBM DeskStar 34GXP 30GB 7,200 RPM ATA66 drive
 
        - CDROM
          – AOpen 1040 Pro 10X IDE DVD-ROM drive
 
        - Memory
          – 2x128MB CAS2 Corsair PC133 SDRAM modules
 
        - Video
          Card – Creative Labs 3D Blaster Annihilator 2 Ultra, NVIDIA drivers
          6.50
 
        - Sound
          Card – Creative Labs SB Live! Platinum 5.1 using original CD drivers
 
        - Modem
          – 3Com ISDN Pro Terminal Adapter for Dual-Channel ISDN
 
       
      And
      the following benchmarking software and games were used
      
       
      ·  3D Mark 2001 – Mad Onion 
      ·  Content Creation Winstone 2001 version 1.0.1 – ZDBOP 
      ·  Quake 3: Arena version 1.17 – id Software 
      ·  Dethkarz version 1.0 – Melbourne House 
      ·  Unreal Tournament version 4.36 – Epic Games
      
       
      In the case of game
      benchmarking, all tests were run five times, rebooting the machine each
      time for each benchmark run. Later, the five results were added and then
      averaged. In the case of standard benchmarks, the results were run once
      after a clean system reboot with only Explorer.exe and Systray running in
      the background. OS used was a clean installation of Microsoft Windows
      Millennium and the version 4.29a VIA 4-in-1 driver release. Even though
      overclocking tests were done, for the purpose of the gaming and standard
      benchmarks, the processor was left on its default 1Ghz speed, (10x clock
      multiplier and 100Mhz Front Side Bus, memory operating at 133Mhz).
      
       
      Graphics Subsystem Performance: 3D Mark
      2001
      
      
                 
      Like I stated on my first impressions article, I’m really not
      fond of Mad Onion’s 3D Mark benchmarking software. While it does an
      excellent job of taxing computer systems with the latest and greatest
      graphical effects, I don’t find its performance figures useful for
      real-world comparisons. Sure, it is nice to compare it against a similarly
      configured machine, but what do I care if my next-door neighbor with the
      same computer gets 300 more 3D Marks than me? The individual frames per
      second results on the different test games though, are much more helpful.
      But, since you guys are hooked on 3D Mark 2001 and wanted scores from it,
      here’s a screenshot of my result:
      
       
        
      
       
      3,274 3D Marks might
      seem like a really low number, especially when you consider the fact that
      people consistently get 7,000 to 8,000 3D Marks with 3D Mark 2000. But the
      main thing to remember here is that 3D Mark 2001 is heavily dependant on
      your video card’s support for the new Direct X8 features. So my GeForce
      2 Ultra 64MB DDR SDRAM video card was simply not up to the task that the
      upcoming GeForce 3 is bound to fill. Still, that score is much higher than
      the 2,345 3D Marks I got from my Pentium III 750Mhz system. And the
      average frame rates I got from the different benchmark games were very
      respectable, hovering around 35-40 fps on the high-detail demos.
      
       
      Content Creation
      Winstone 2001 Scores:      
      
        
          | 
             CC Winstone 2k1
            
             
           | 
          
            AMD
            Athlon 1Ghz System
            
            
           | 
          
            Pentium
            III 750Mhz System
            
            
           | 
         
        
          | 
              
            
             
           | 
          
              33.2
            
             
           | 
          
             28.4
            
             
           | 
         
       
               
      As was to be expected, the 1Ghz Athlon system beat out my reference
      Pentium III 750Mhz system by a good margin. Still, there is no question
      that the 750Mhz did reach a pretty respectable score. But then again, when
      you take into consideration the low cost of a 1Ghz AMD Thunderbird
      processor, that number becomes fairly attractive.
      
       
      Quake 3 Arena: OpenGL Performance
      
      
                 
      Under Quake 3 Arena, the 1Ghz Thunderbird system was tested using
      the two demo files id software included with the game, Demo1 and Demo2: 
       
      
       
      
        
          | 
             Q3A Demo1
            
             
           | 
          
            AMD
            Athlon 1Ghz System
            
            
           | 
          
            Pentium
            750Mhz System
            
            
           | 
         
        
          | 
             640x480x32
            
             
           | 
          
             118.5
            
             
           | 
          
             94.2
            
             
           | 
         
        
          | 
             800x600x32
            
             
           | 
          
             116.2
            
             
           | 
          
             91.7
            
             
           | 
         
        
          | 
             1024x768x32
            
             
           | 
          
             103.7
            
             
           | 
          
             82.4
            
             
           | 
         
       
      Here we can see that
      the KickAss Gear Athlon kit takes a sizeable advantage over my reference
      PIII 750Mhz system. Ideally, I should have compared the Athlon system
      against a 1Ghz PIII system, but I was not able to secure a PIII 1Ghz
      system. Since the KickAss Gear unit has to go back next week, either I
      compared it to my PIII 750Mhz system or I only used the Athlon numbers. Of
      course, this article will be updated as soon as I can secure a reference
      PIII 1Ghz system.
      
       
      
        
          | 
             Q3A Demo2
            
             
           | 
          
            AMD
            Athlon 1Ghz System
            
            
           | 
          
            Pentium
            III 750Mhz System
            
            
           | 
         
        
          | 
             640x480x32
            
             
           | 
          
             115.4
            
             
           | 
          
             90.4
            
             
           | 
         
        
          | 
             800x600x32
            
             
           | 
          
             114.8
            
             
           | 
          
             88.1
            
             
           | 
         
        
          | 
             1024x768x32
            
             
           | 
          
             105.3
            
             
           | 
          
             82.8
            
             
           | 
         
       
      These demos also serve
      to illustrate that the NVIDIA GeForce 2 Ultra GTS chip requires at least a
      900Mhz or above processor in order to take full advantage of it’s power
      and high-speed DDR SDRAM memory. As we can see from both demo scores, no
      one will be able to complain from maintaining frame rates above the 100
      mark. These tests were all run in 32-bit color, but if you take the
      resolution to 16-bit you will be able to reach 140 frames per second on
      the Athlon system, while breaking the 120 frames per second mark on the
      PIII 750Mhz system.
      
       
      Unreal Tournament 4.36: Direct3D
      Performance
      
      
              
      Even though Unreal Tournament as a game is getting old, there is no
      question that it still remains one of the most demanding Direct3D
      applications currently available. As such, it only seemed fair to include
      performance numbers from Reverend’s Thunder demo:
      
       
      
        
          | 
             UT: Thunder
            
             
           | 
          
            AMD
            Athlon 1Ghz System
            
            
           | 
          
            Pentium
            III 750Mhz System
            
            
           | 
         
        
          | 
             640x480x32
            
             
           | 
          
              89.45
            
             
           | 
          
             75.76
            
             
           | 
         
        
          | 
             800x600x32
            
             
           | 
          
              86.32
            
             
           | 
          
             74.16
            
             
           | 
         
        
          | 
             1024x768x32
            
             
           | 
          
              84.79
            
             
           | 
          
             71.92
            
             
           | 
         
       
      Once again, the numbers
      speak for themselves. The 1Ghz KickAss Gear upgrade kit is pretty much
      able to reach and sustain 90 frames per second in Unreal Tournament, while
      my PIII 750Mhz system tops out at 75 frames per second. Theoretically, the
      human eye is not able to perceive any difference on anything over 60
      frames per second, but you can feel the difference when controlling the
      on-screen action, and the higher the frame rate, the smoother the controls
      will be.
      
       
      Overclocking Test Results:
      
      
      
      
      Being an unlocked processor, I was anxious to see what was the
      limit for this puppy. So using the jumperless overclocking features found
      on the ASUS A7V133, I started out slowly to see what was the absolute
      limit for this particular processor.
      
       
      Going with the clock
      multiplier route first, I increased the clock to 10.5 on a 100Mhz Front
      Side Bus, which yielded a 1,050Mhz speed. This isn’t exactly a huge
      jump, so I moved up to an 11x multiplier, which yielded a better result of
      1.1Ghz. After that, I moved up to 11.5, which resulted in a 1,150Mhz
      speed. Unfortunately, using this multiplier resulted in the computer not
      detecting my hard drive. Resetting the system only resulted in a hard
      lock-up. So going with a multiplier-only overclock, the most stable speed
      achieved was 1.1Ghz. Not a huge jump, but it did have a good increase in
      the Q3A benchmark numbers:
      
       
      
        
          | 
             Q3A
            Demo1 OC
            
             
           | 
          
            AMD
            1.1Ghz Overclocked
            
            
           | 
         
        
          | 
             640x480x32
            
             
           | 
          
             128.3
            
             
           | 
         
        
          | 
             800x600x32
            
             
           | 
          
             126.7
            
             
           | 
         
        
          | 
             1024x768x32
            
             
           | 
          
             116.4
            
             
           | 
         
       
        
      
        
          | 
             Q3A
            Demo2 OC
            
             
           | 
          
            AMD
            1.1Ghz Overclocked
            
            
           | 
         
        
          | 
             640x480x32
            
             
           | 
          
             124.6
            
             
           | 
         
        
          | 
             800x600x32
            
             
           | 
          
             123.9
            
             
           | 
         
        
          | 
             1024x768x32
            
             
           | 
          
             118.7
            
             
           | 
         
       
      With this overclock,
      the CPU would max out with a 58 degree Celsius temperature under load,
      which is pretty close to the maximum operational temperature for the 1Ghz
      Thunderbird of 60 degrees Celsius. Still, I’m confident that with better
      cooling solution, (the processor came with a standard-issue AMD heatsink
      and fan combination), I would have been able to operate the processor
      reliably at the 1.2Ghz level. 
      Going with a combined
      multiplier and front side bus overclock, the system fared a bit better.
      Using a 7.5x multiplier with the KT133’s support for the 133Mhz EV6
      Front Side Bus, you can reach 1Ghz and take advantage of the higher
      performance obtained from operating at a 266Mhz Front Side Bus and the
      memory at 133Mhz. Using this method, the highest front side bus achieved
      was 145Mhz, which yielded a speed of 1,089Mhz. I fell a bit short of
      replicating the 1.1Ghz results obtained by overclocking the multiplier
      only, as the system became unstable and crashed repeatedly when operating
      at a 147Mhz FSB speed.
      
       
      In both cases, running
      3D Mark 2001’s demo mode for five straight hours tested the maximum
      limits attainable. If the demo failed for any reason, the system was
      reset, and if it failed again, the system was reverted to the setting
      before the crash.
      
       
      Conclusion:
      
      
       
      Frankly, for $329, you really can’t ask for anything better than
      what  KickAss Gear offers with their Athlon upgrade kits. Even though
      the official kits feature ABIT’s KT7A-RAID motherboard, there isn’t a
      single user that could complain about the stability of ABIT’s offering.
      You are also assured a system that is both stable, (thanks to the burn-in
      process done at the store), and running at the highest possible clock
      speed, (which means the processors arrive clock-unlocked for maximum
      overclocking potential).
       
      Offering blistering
      performance and good value, it’s really hard not to recommend the
      KickAss Gear Athlon upgrade kit.  |